|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Guys, you give them way too much credit. It's easy to ban someone from behind a computer, then hide it by not announcing it to the community, along with a justified reason.
Don't give them the credit that they don't deserve. It gives henchmen a bad name. Last edited by samg; 10-11-2015 at 03:32 PM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I was looking at some of your work featured in Bob Gaddis' book, and reading about you on page 269, when I read the statement that you had been working with the Randall's since the early '80's, and Bob commented that neither you or Gary Randall can " foresee any reason to change the arrangement." Kind of surreal. All I can say Rick, is that it's a pleasure to be on the forum that you are a part of! For those of you who don't have Bob Gaddis' book Randall Made Knives: A history of the Man and the Blades, here is one of the featured photos on page 271 of the book. Rick, if I may ask, is your relationship with the Randall shop still good? I certainly hope so. I don't own one of your pieces, but intend to at some point. On a Rick Bowles special! Rick, you are a tremendous asset to this forum. Thanks, Sam Granade |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
My relationship with the Randall shop and the Randall family is as it has been for 35 years. I was banned from the old forum because I tried to stop the new owner from taking advantage of a grieving widow for nothing more than money. For what it's worth, I have let it be known that I will not, under any circumstances, contribute to that forum as long as it's administered and controlled by a supercilious, autocratic twit who has no knowledge, interest or affection for Randall Made Knives.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I just happened to see this thread after not being here for a loooong time.
It did pique my interest as I had some contact with some of the folks from the "collectors" club at the Blade show in June. And it was not really what I would call a pleasure. Mebbe some of you folks could "enlighten " me . I own a early 50's era Randall #4-8, iirc. That's really irrelavent to this all. I showed it around there to a number of the fellas in the Randall booths. This knife has some provenance as it is inscribed with the owners SS number and initials on a NS plate in the ebony butt. Every dang guy I showed it to told me it was a 300 dollar knife . That was like the given mantra from all I spoke to. Seemed like they had a rehearsed response for anyone intruding on their space. I didn't bother explain what Tom Clinton had told me about the knife when I first acquired it, mebbe 10 or 12 yrs ago. Their number was waaaay off what Tom had quoted me. I think what I'm trying to say is, I understand the crappy attitude described above. I certainly don't like it but such is life. Really dislike people pissin' on my shoes and telling me it's raining. Thanks for listening. I'm gonna keep the friggin' knife and use it. bruce Godlesky/birdogForge __________________ I love all of God's creatures, right next to the mashed potatoes and gravy. www.BirdogForge.com |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Bruce
Thanks for your post. Not sure who you talked with at blade. Maybe it would be a good idea to start a new thread, and post a few pics along with what you know about the knife, and maybe some of the knowledable guys here can give you some input about it. Regards, Sam G |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I'll do that Sam. I know a coupla the commedians I talked to. Their self -importance didn't go far with me....
__________________ I love all of God's creatures, right next to the mashed potatoes and gravy. www.BirdogForge.com |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
OK, so here is precisely what we have been referring to about "those in charge" over at ktf.
It was brought to my attention that my name was brought up over there, so I checked it out. It was a thread where many members were questioning why people are being banned. Here was an inquiry as to why I was banned: Quote:
An honest observation by a forum member, Sounds like a reasonable inquiry, right? Here was Turbevilles response. Quote:
I really don't have much to say about this response, other than to say that this is how they handle honest questions and inquiries, squelch it by locking the thread, or banning if one doesn't shut up. Personal attacks, and mud slinging by me? I don't think so. All that is evidenced in Ricks quote above. I do appreciate the ones who have asked why I was banned. The record is there for anyone to see in the threads I participated in. With the exception of the ones where they were ugly to me, they were deleted. I captured some of them for my record. I have absolutely no interest in going back to ktf. There are some great folks there, but also some who have let a little power and control go to their head. They should remember that we are all Randall customers, though my interest is being challenged. After the misunderstanding of my post about GTR, I sent an email to the shop letting them know that my post was misunderstood..... No response.... It is what it is. Thanks, Sam G Last edited by samg; 10-28-2015 at 06:27 AM. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah completely neutral party here, from the evidence presented, it's clear that the owner is a little power crazed. IMHO, the only time you should ban someone from a forum is if they're posting profanity or strictly trying to troll people. Banning someone because they refuse to agree with you is silly and will only drive people away.
Your comments didn't appear to me as an attack. I wonder if the person in question even knew your posts existed. I guess the PC police found you and determined that you might potentially offend someone. We all know in today's society offending someone with your views just can't be allowed. __________________ -Hunter |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
The problem with computer is that your words can be misconstrued too easliy. I am a member over there since 2005 and seldom post. What it was, and what KTF has become is not good. If I had more to say I would post more.
Last edited by cochise; 10-28-2015 at 07:19 AM. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Cochise.
You are right, misunderstanding of words can easily happen. What was unfortunate was that when I was questioned and asked about what I meant about my statement about GTR, I explained, but was not believed. In other words, their interpretation was more important than my meaning. Talk about arrogance. I was accused of taking a shot at Gary Randall. Let's see if that makes sense. I collect his beautiful knives, and I have never met him. Hey, seems like a good enough reason to suspect rude intentions....to them anyway. I am glad many others didn't take it that way. It certainly wasn't intended that way. I would have no reason to insult Gary. Heck, I had reason to go after Stanaback, but didn't. Not until he insulted me for no reason. It's time to let it go, and I thank those here for allowing me to defend myself in a public forum, after being wrongfully insulted over at ktf. Regards, Sam |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
I said in my last post it was time to let it go...it is, but I just disdain when someone misrepresents what I have said, especially when I can't post over there to set the record straight.
In their thread "something oddish" a member misquoted an observation that I made here on this forum. His quote: Quote:
I made the observation that the Heiser flap was blunted, not pointed. Further more, never stated it was irrefutable. Here was my actual observation in my 2nd post of the "Early RMK sheath belt loop end die differences" thread on this forum: Quote:
Rather than stating that it was irrefutable, I concluded on that 2nd post: Quote:
This is what drove me nuts over there at ktf. I put a lot of time into research, never claimed authority, only observations, out in the open to be proved or disproved. Sam Last edited by samg; 10-28-2015 at 07:04 PM. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Good to see said member on the ktf forum clarified and corrected the record about my statement about hone pocket flaps.
Quote:
I'm not quite sure what " I believe the gist of my previous post is clear to most" means, but I would guess that it means "its OK that I COMPLETELY misquote someone, but you know what I mean." This is the root of the problem over there at ktf. This simple illustration is a perfect example of why I was accused of being on a "crusade for truth" over there. My comment about the flaps was obviously an observation, based on looking at many sheaths. The ktf member completely twisted what I said. If we are going to reference a statement by another member, at least get it right. I have always positioned my comments as observations, not irrefutable evidence. It was these type of irresponsible, incorrect statements that I sought to correct, that landed me in the banned bin for "not letting it go" as the owner of the ktf forum mischaracterized me. I guess the style can be called bait and ban. I will always defend my position, and if some want to label me as a crusader for truth, then I guess that's a good thing. After all, isn't it a good thing to try and prevent ANYONE from twisting your words? Again, as I said before, its what drove me nuts over at ktf Regards, Sam G Last edited by samg; 10-29-2015 at 11:47 AM. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Sam, I have to say that I closely followed and contributed to your posts regarding Heiser and early RBJ sheath observations and not once did I ever feel that you were out of line or disrespectful. I thoroughly enjoyed the discussion and the mystery of it all. It was good clean fun to dig a little deeper into the topic. Certainly more fun than doing yard work.
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Tom.
You posted many photos and ideas that contributed to the fun of those threads. That's what it should be about. In hind sight, a narrative had been established regarding the sheaths years ago, and when Jacks findings and observations came to light, many members posted in support of these observations, but to protect the established narrative, though not founded on solid research, the personal attacks and smokescreens began, and any further findings were squelched. Case closed. Though others of the "establishment" did the insulting and name calling, we were banned. It has been said that many in the collecting community have accepted the findings as a result of Jacks in depth, insightful research about the maker of these sheaths. It's was Jack and Ron's conviction that caused me to look into it, and found more consistent evidence that led me to the same conclusions. I didn't care which camp was right, I paid attention only to the evidence. It was fun Tom, and thanks for all of your contributions to the subject. Regards, Sam G. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
I don't collect Randalls, but I appreciate them and enjoy the Randall Made Knife threads here. I agree wholeheartedly about the 3/16" thick blade for woodcrafting being too thick, the only thing that thickness is good for is batoning or fighting. I personally am of the opinion that if you want to chop wood bring a small hatchet, it will work better than any knife that isn't a huge Bowie. I guess RMK is following the "thicker is better" fad for knives. I have seen some as short as 2 1/2 inches and 5/32 thick. A thick knife is fine for a fighter, but I wouldn't want to clean a trout with it.
I never read this thread before as it was before I joined this Forum. I have been on other forums and I personally find this one to be the best in my experience. I have learned and hopefully taught a thing or two and have learned more about Randalls than elsewhere. |
Tags |
back, bee, blade, book, cleaning, diamond, easy, first time, hand, home, knife, knives, made, make, post, problem, project, randall, rare, rolling, sheath, sheaths, shop, show, sog |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Terrill Hoffman ... Banned Content | KNAdmin | Knife Photography Discussion | 0 | 11-25-2003 05:44 AM |
Remember "Dr. Gene"...? (now banned) | Osprey Guy | Knife Making Discussions | 24 | 05-07-2003 07:38 AM |